Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRCX vs RHFTX
FTRCX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRCX vs. RHFTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRCX is a Hold and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHFTX has more cash in the bank: 49.5B vs. FTRCX (143M). RHFTX pays higher dividends than FTRCX: RHFTX (1.85) vs FTRCX (1.49). FTRCX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: FTRCX (19 years) vs RHFTX (10 years). FTRCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). FTRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.89 vs. RHFTX (7.00). RHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTRCX: RHFTX (250) vs FTRCX (1000). RHFTX (7.45) and FTRCX (7.21) have marching annual gain over last year. RHFTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.78 vs. FTRCX (21.70).
| FTRCX | RHFTX | FTRCX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.48 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.48 | 365% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.214 | 3.549 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143M | 49.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.85 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 7.45 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.64 | 22.75 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.70 | 39.78 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers