Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGACX
FTRNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.73
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.93B
FTRNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. FTRNX (3.83B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FTRNX (0.59) vs RGACX (0.08). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FTRNX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. FTRNX (-3.83). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 51.57 vs. RGACX (42.39).
| FTRNX | RGACX | FTRNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.577 | 5.195 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.83B | 307B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.08 | 749% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | 5.98 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.65 | 54.46 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.57 | 42.39 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.94 | 68.83 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement