Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGACX
FTRNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.97
Change-$0.34 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.19B
FTRNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. FTRNX (4.12B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FTRNX (0.55) vs RGACX (0.07). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FTRNX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. FTRNX (0.53). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 52.86 vs. RGACX (42.82).
| FTRNX | RGACX | FTRNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.558 | 11.085 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.12B | 324B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.07 | 746% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.53 | 9.01 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.51 | 56.70 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.86 | 42.82 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.42 | 77.22 | 144% |