Ad is loading...
FTRNX vs RGACX
FTRNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.16
Change+$0.52 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
FTRNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. FTRNX (3.45B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FTRNX (0.65) vs RGACX (0.08). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FTRNX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. FTRNX (-6.43). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.54 vs. RGACX (42.06).
| FTRNX | RGACX | FTRNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.397 | -2.542 | 448% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.45B | 284B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.08 | 766% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.43 | 3.09 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.86 | 32.79 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.54 | 42.06 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.51 | 58.28 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers