Ad is loading...
FTRNX vs RGACX
FTRNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$64.89
Change+$1.02 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
FTRNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. FTRNX (3.4B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FTRNX (0.66) vs RGACX (0.09). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FTRNX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.75 vs. FTRNX (-16.48). FTRNX (46.97) and RGACX (44.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTRNX | RGACX | FTRNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.94 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.767 | -9.862 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.09 | 771% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.48 | -5.75 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.78 | 5.76 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.97 | 44.89 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.59 | 47.51 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...