Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs PCAFX
FTSDX vs PCAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs PCAFX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.17
Change+$0.13 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
Prospector Capital Appreciation
Price$22.74
Change+$0.21 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.21M
FTSDX vs PCAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. PCAFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Buy and PCAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. PCAFX (43.2M). FTSDX pays higher dividends than PCAFX: FTSDX (1.99) vs PCAFX (0.51). FTSDX was incepted earlier than PCAFX: FTSDX (21 years) vs PCAFX (18 years). PCAFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FTSDX (1.17). FTSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. PCAFX (30.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCAFX: FTSDX (0) vs PCAFX (10000). FTSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.66 vs. PCAFX (2.50). PCAFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.65 vs. FTSDX (27.59).
| FTSDX | PCAFX | FTSDX / PCAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.16 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.56 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.598 | 1.854 | 140% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 43.2M | 11,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 0.51 | 390% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 2.50 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.86 | 9.22 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.59 | 30.65 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.16 | 47.23 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement