Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTTAX vs RBHHX
FTTAX vs RBHHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTAX vs. RBHHX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTAX is a StrongBuy and RBHHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHHX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. FTTAX (108M). FTTAX pays higher dividends than RBHHX: FTTAX (1.59) vs RBHHX (0.71). FTTAX was incepted earlier than RBHHX: FTTAX (19 years) vs RBHHX (11 years). RBHHX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTTAX (1.06). FTTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.84 vs. RBHHX (5.00). RBHHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTTAX: RBHHX (250) vs FTTAX (1000). RBHHX (9.50) and FTTAX (9.10) have marching annual gain over last year. RBHHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.79 vs. FTTAX (30.20).
| FTTAX | RBHHX | FTTAX / RBHHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.17 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.17 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.137 | 6.599 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 40.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.71 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.10 | 9.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.76 | 36.60 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.20 | 43.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.86 | 66.18 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers