It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGWSO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GWSO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FTV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -1.27% price change this week, while GWSO (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +10.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.96%.
FTV is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
GWSO is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2023.
This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
FTV | GWSO | FTV / GWSO | |
Capitalization | 30.2B | 40.1M | 75,312% |
EBITDA | 1.57B | -1.21M | -130,049% |
Gain YTD | 5.439 | -10.000 | -54% |
P/E Ratio | 34.82 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 6.07B | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 1.89B | 28.8K | 6,559,028% |
Total Debt | 3.81B | 380K | 1,002,632% |
FTV | GWSO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTV's Valuation (42) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWSO (100) in the null industry. This means that FTV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWSO’s over the last 12 months.
FTV's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWSO (87) in the null industry. This means that FTV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWSO’s over the last 12 months.
FTV's SMR Rating (91) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as GWSO (100) in the null industry. This means that FTV’s stock grew similarly to GWSO’s over the last 12 months.
GWSO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FTV (54) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that GWSO’s stock grew similarly to FTV’s over the last 12 months.
FTV's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWSO (100) in the null industry. This means that FTV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWSO’s over the last 12 months.
FTV | GWSO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago53% | 5 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago48% | 22 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago44% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GWSO and FTV have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWSO and FTV's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWSO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GWSO | 100% | -5.71% | ||
FTV - GWSO | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
KYCCF - GWSO | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
FCUV - GWSO | 8% Poorly correlated | -11.58% | ||
HXGBY - GWSO | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
CODAF - GWSO | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |