Ad is loading...
FTZCX vs VIMAX
FTZCX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTZCX vs VIMAX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C
Price$50.94
Change+$0.80 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.11M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$325.50
Change+$2.24 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.84B
FTZCX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. FTZCX (190M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: VIMAX (1.45) vs FTZCX (0.00). FTZCX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: FTZCX (4 years) vs VIMAX (23 years). FTZCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). FTZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMAX (13.00). FTZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: FTZCX (1000) vs VIMAX (3000). FTZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.57 vs. VIMAX (7.45).
| FTZCX | VIMAX | FTZCX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.05 | 3,680% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.05 | 4,220% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.697 | -0.419 | -405% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 182B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 7.45 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.22 | 19.99 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 64.61 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...