Ad is loading...
FTZCX vs VIMSX
FTZCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZCX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C
Price$50.15
Change-$1.50 (-2.90%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$72.18
Change-$2.49 (-3.33%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTZCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 190B vs. FTZCX (134M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: VIMSX (1.38) vs FTZCX (0.00). FTZCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZCX (4 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). FTZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FTZCX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). FTZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.46 vs. VIMSX (17.86).
| FTZCX | VIMSX | FTZCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.643 | 17.795 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 190B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.46 | 17.86 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.66 | 11.34 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 54.73 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.26 | - |