Ad is loading...
FTZCX vs VIMSX
FTZCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZCX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C
Price$49.64
Change-$1.30 (-2.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.11M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$70.31
Change-$1.44 (-2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.84B
FTZCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. FTZCX (190M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZCX: VIMSX (1.33) vs FTZCX (0.00). FTZCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZCX (4 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). FTZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FTZCX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). FTZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.57 vs. VIMSX (7.43).
| FTZCX | VIMSX | FTZCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.17 | 1,241% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.697 | -0.444 | -382% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 182B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 7.43 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.22 | 19.95 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 64.49 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.77 | - |