Ad is loading...
FTZIX vs VIMSX
FTZIX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZIX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behavrl Uncnstd Eq
Price$47.39
Change-$2.88 (-5.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.35M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$68.04
Change-$3.54 (-4.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.84B
FTZIX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZIX vs. VIMSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZIX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. FTZIX (190M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZIX: VIMSX (1.46) vs FTZIX (0.12). FTZIX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZIX (6 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZIX (1.27) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZIX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZIX (100000). FTZIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. VIMSX (6.63). FTZIX return over 5 years is better than : 165.46 vs. VIMSX (113.13).
| FTZIX | VIMSX | FTZIX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.17 | 747% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.489 | -0.622 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 182B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.46 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | 6.63 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.69 | 9.75 | 397% |
| Returns for 5 years | 165.46 | 113.13 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...