Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZIX vs VIMSX
FTZIX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZIX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behavrl Uncnstd Eq
Price$55.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.87M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$77.52
Change+$0.46 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
FTZIX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZIX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZIX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FTZIX (233M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZIX: VIMSX (1.40) vs FTZIX (0.11). FTZIX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZIX (7 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZIX (1.27) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZIX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZIX (100000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. FTZIX (16.57). FTZIX return over 5 years is better than : 115.73 vs. VIMSX (73.64).
| FTZIX | VIMSX | FTZIX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.17 | 747% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.819 | 7.625 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.40 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.57 | 17.63 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.21 | 43.06 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.73 | 73.64 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 127.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement