Ad is loading...
FTZIX vs VIMSX
FTZIX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZIX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behavrl Uncnstd Eq
Price$48.45
Change+$0.87 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.4M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$69.37
Change+$1.27 (+1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.23B
FTZIX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTZIX vs. VIMSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTZIX is a Buy and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. FTZIX (193M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZIX: VIMSX (1.46) vs FTZIX (0.12). FTZIX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZIX (6 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZIX (1.27) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZIX: VIMSX (3000) vs FTZIX (100000). FTZIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. VIMSX (4.35). FTZIX return over 5 years is better than : 119.09 vs. VIMSX (72.94).
| FTZIX | VIMSX | FTZIX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.17 | 747% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.761 | -5.454 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 193M | 175B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.46 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 4.35 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.44 | 10.19 | 348% |
| Returns for 5 years | 119.09 | 72.94 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.13 | - |