FUL
Price
$59.60
Change
+$0.43 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.35B
54 days until earnings call
LIN
Price
$472.88
Change
+$1.39 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
223.16B
7 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs LIN

Header iconFUL vs LIN Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs LINBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$59.60
Change+$0.43 (+0.73%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization4.35B
Linde
Price$472.88
Change+$1.39 (+0.29%)
Volume$15.52K
Capitalization223.16B
FUL vs LIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. LIN commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongBuy and LIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FUL: $59.17 vs. LIN: $471.49)
Brand notoriety: FUL and LIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 61% vs. LIN: 82%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. LIN: $223.16B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. LIN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $223.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIN is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIN is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.30% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

LIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.07% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIN($223B) has a higher market cap than FUL($4.35B). LIN has higher P/E ratio than FUL: LIN (36.81) vs FUL (28.70). LIN YTD gains are higher at: 13.358 vs. FUL (-11.611). LIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. FUL (540M). LIN has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. FUL (165M). FUL has less debt than LIN: FUL (1.83B) vs LIN (20.3B). LIN has higher revenues than FUL: LIN (32.9B) vs FUL (3.51B).
FULLINFUL / LIN
Capitalization4.35B223B2%
EBITDA540M12.2B4%
Gain YTD-11.61113.358-87%
P/E Ratio28.7036.8178%
Revenue3.51B32.9B11%
Total Cash165M4.66B4%
Total Debt1.83B20.3B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs LIN: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
LIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6270
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
635
SMR RATING
1..100
8250
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3555
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LIN (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (63) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's SMR Rating (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (82) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LIN (55) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULLIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VONV87.08-0.26
-0.30%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
INCE58.62-0.22
-0.37%
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
FMET34.82-0.15
-0.43%
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
KMLM27.09-0.18
-0.66%
KraneShares Mount LucasMgdFutsIdxStgyETF
FFSM27.78-0.20
-0.71%
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
-2.10%
RPM - FUL
71%
Closely correlated
+8.58%
KWR - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
-3.55%
SCL - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
PPG - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
AVNT - FUL
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
More