FUL vs LIN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and LIN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +7.05% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -0.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.
LIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.89% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| FUL | LIN | FUL / LIN | |
| Capitalization | 4.35B | 223B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 540M | 12.2B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | -14.957 | 6.876 | -218% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.70 | 36.81 | 78% |
| Revenue | 3.51B | 32.9B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 165M | 4.66B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 1.83B | 20.3B | 9% |
FUL | LIN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (54) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LIN (85) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (50) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (80) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LIN (56) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | LIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 58% | 7 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 1 day ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
FUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.