Advertisement
FUL vs SHW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? H.B. Fuller (FUL) vs. The Sherwin-Williams (SHW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FUL and SHW operate in adjacent materials sectors but differ in business focus, with FUL emphasizing specialty adhesives and SHW centered on paints and coatings.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks delivering modest year-to-date returns amid broader market gains, with FUL posting stronger second-quarter earnings growth compared to SHW's more stable but slower momentum.
- Sector exposure places both companies in chemicals and materials, where input costs, housing and industrial demand, and supply chain factors influence performance.
- Valuation metrics indicate SHW trades at a premium multiple relative to peers, while FUL offers a comparatively lower price-to-earnings ratio.
- Recent developments include FUL's acquisition interest in medical solutions and consistent dividend history, contrasted with SHW's emphasis on operational efficiency in a challenging demand environment.
- Market sentiment reflects cautious positioning for both, with relative performance tied to economic indicators affecting construction, manufacturing, and consumer spending.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare stocks within the same broad industry to assess relative value, growth potential, and risk characteristics. FUL, representing H.B. Fuller Company, and SHW, representing The Sherwin-Williams Company, provide a focused lens on the materials sector. This comparison appeals to those evaluating specialty chemicals exposure, particularly individuals seeking to understand differences in end-market sensitivity, earnings momentum, and positioning amid fluctuating industrial and construction activity. The analysis draws on verifiable financial metrics and recent developments to highlight trade-offs without favoring either security.
FUL Overview and Recent Performance
H.B. Fuller Company specializes in adhesives, sealants, and coatings used across packaging, construction, and industrial applications. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in a range reflecting measured investor response to second-quarter results, which showed net revenue of $950 million, up 5.8% year-over-year, with organic growth of 2.6%. Adjusted earnings per share rose 19% to $1.41. Market activity has incorporated these figures alongside broader sector influences such as raw material costs and demand from manufacturing clients. The company maintains a history of quarterly dividends and recently announced an offer for Advanced Medical Solutions Group, signaling expansion efforts. Share price behavior around $55–56 levels has exhibited stability relative to peers, though it has not kept pace with broader equity indices in the trailing twelve months.
SHW Overview and Recent Performance
The Sherwin-Williams Company is a leading provider of paints, coatings, and related products serving architectural, industrial, and automotive markets. Recent market activity has shown the stock around $317–320, with year-to-date returns near 1.5% amid softer housing and industrial demand signals. Performance has been shaped by operational focus on cost management and product mix optimization. The company reported full-year 2025 sales exceeding $23 billion, though 2026 guidance reflected tempered expectations relative to prior consensus. Sentiment in recent weeks has remained steady, supported by brand strength and distribution network advantages, while the shares have lagged the S&P 500 over the past year. Valuation multiples remain elevated compared with industry averages.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. The platform features bots with varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, including ranges of returns and risk metrics that can span single-digit to double-digit annualized figures depending on the model. All bots differ in the specific tickers they target and their approach to market signals. Traders interested in automated strategies can explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FUL and SHW share exposure to the materials sector yet pursue distinct business models: FUL focuses on high-specification adhesives with applications in diverse industrial segments, while SHW dominates architectural and protective coatings tied closely to construction cycles. Growth drivers for FUL include recent earnings expansion and potential acquisition synergies, whereas SHW emphasizes scale efficiencies and brand loyalty. Recent momentum favors FUL following stronger quarterly results, while SHW offers greater stability but slower near-term acceleration. Risk factors encompass raw material volatility for both, with SHW more sensitive to housing trends and FUL to manufacturing output. Market sentiment remains balanced, reflecting comparable challenges in a moderate-growth economic backdrop.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, recent revenue growth, and relative positioning within the materials space, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable trend continuation to FUL. This assessment stems from stronger second-quarter metrics and expansion initiatives, balanced against SHW’s established scale and premium valuation. Outcomes remain subject to evolving economic data and sector-specific catalysts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongBuy and SHW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SHW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +10.43% price change this week, while SHW (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +8.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +5.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2026.
SHW is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+5.53% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| FUL | SHW | FUL / SHW | |
| Capitalization | 3.29B | 89.8B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 559M | 4.74B | 12% |
| Gain YTD | 3.952 | 14.652 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.12 | 34.11 | 53% |
| Revenue | 3.51B | 24.4B | 14% |
| Total Cash | 114M | 294M | 39% |
| Total Debt | 2.07B | 14.2B | 15% |
FUL | SHW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 43 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHW (92). This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHW’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (98). This means that SHW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's SMR Rating (18) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (75). This means that SHW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (50). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (91). This means that SHW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | SHW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 53% | 6 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 59% | 21 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 44% |
Advertisement
FUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUL | 100% | +3.21% | ||
| RPM - FUL | 75% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| PPG - FUL | 70% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| AVNT - FUL | 68% Closely correlated | +7.13% | ||
| IOSP - FUL | 66% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| OLN - FUL | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||
SHW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHW has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHW jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.