FUL
Price
$56.35
Change
-$0.65 (-1.14%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.03B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHW
Price
$344.86
Change
-$0.35 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
83.72B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUL vs SHW

FUL vs SHW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUL vs. SHW commentary
Aug 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and SHW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2026
Stock price -- (FUL: $56.35 vs. SHW: $344.86)
Brand notoriety: FUL and SHW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 58% vs. SHW: 81%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $3.03B vs. SHW: $83.72B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.03B. SHW’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $83.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $225.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $12.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHW is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SHW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHW is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -4.00% price change this week, while SHW (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2026.

SHW is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.11% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHW($83.7B) has a higher market cap than FUL($3.03B). SHW has higher P/E ratio than FUL: SHW (31.81) vs FUL (16.72). SHW YTD gains are higher at: 7.187 vs. FUL (-4.083). SHW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.74B vs. FUL (559M). SHW has more cash in the bank: 294M vs. FUL (114M). FUL has less debt than SHW: FUL (2.07B) vs SHW (14.2B). SHW has higher revenues than FUL: SHW (24.4B) vs FUL (3.51B).
FULSHWFUL / SHW
Capitalization3.03B83.7B4%
EBITDA559M4.74B12%
Gain YTD-4.0837.187-57%
P/E Ratio16.7231.8153%
Revenue3.51B24.4B14%
Total Cash114M294M39%
Total Debt2.07B14.2B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs SHW: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
SHW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
7318
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9460
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHW (91). This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHW’s over the last 12 months.

SHW's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (100). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

SHW's SMR Rating (18) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (73). This means that SHW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

SHW's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (60). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

SHW's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (94). This means that SHW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULSHW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YELP23.180.67
+2.98%
YELP
CROX122.230.54
+0.44%
Crocs
ASX37.78-1.12
-2.88%
ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd
COCP1.10-0.04
-3.51%
Cocrystal Pharma
LTRX5.37-0.66
-10.95%
Lantronix

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
-1.14%
RPM - FUL
73%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
PPG - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
AVNT - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
OLN - FUL
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
ASIX - FUL
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More

SHW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHW has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHW jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHW
1D Price
Change %
SHW100%
-0.10%
RPM - SHW
79%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
PPG - SHW
73%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
AXTA - SHW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
ECL - SHW
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
FUL - SHW
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
More