Advertisement
FUL vs SHW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) vs. The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- H.B. Fuller (FUL) has shown stronger year-to-date performance at approximately 6%, outpacing Sherwin-Williams (SHW)'s 4.4% gain amid recent market activity.
- FUL recently beat Q1 earnings estimates and raised its dividend by 4.3%, boosting sentiment, while SHW faces headwinds from rising commodity costs ahead of its earnings report.
- Both operate in the specialty chemicals sector, but SHW boasts a significantly larger market capitalization (market cap, total value of shares outstanding) of $83.7 billion compared to FUL's $3.4 billion.
- FUL trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 21.7 versus SHW's 32.9, suggesting relatively better valuation in recent trading.
- Recent momentum favors FUL with one-month gains around 5.7%, while SHW has experienced softer performance amid sector pressures.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW), two leaders in the specialty chemicals sector focusing on adhesives and coatings, respectively. Investors tracking materials stocks amid fluctuating commodity prices and industrial demand may find value in assessing their relative performance, valuation metrics, and market positioning. Traders seeking short-term momentum or long-term stability in cyclical industries will benefit from this head-to-head analysis of recent trends and key drivers.
FUL Overview and Recent Performance
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) manufactures adhesives, sealants, and specialty chemicals for hygiene, engineering, and construction applications across global markets. In recent weeks, FUL shares have demonstrated resilience, trading around $63 with a 52-week range of $48.71 to $68.63. The stock has gained over 6% year-to-date and 16% over the past year, supported by a Q1 earnings beat where adjusted EPS reached $0.57 against expectations of $0.56, alongside EBITDA margin expansion to 15.4% through cost efficiencies. A 4.3% quarterly dividend increase further enhanced investor sentiment, offsetting softer organic volumes in a challenging demand environment.
SHW Overview and Recent Performance
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) develops and distributes paints, coatings, and related products through retail stores, consumer brands, and performance segments worldwide. Recently, SHW shares have hovered near $338, within a 52-week range of $301.58 to $379.65. Year-to-date gains stand at about 4.5%, with one-year returns at 1.9%, reflecting caution due to rising input costs and a softening housing market. Analyst adjustments, including downgrades, have tempered expectations ahead of Q1 results, though the company maintains a robust dividend of $0.80 per share.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available—specifically 351 in total—that analyze thousands of tickers with diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like signal agents, virtual agents, and brokerage agents. Only 25 of the most suitable for current market conditions earn a spot in this dynamic section, selected by AI for promising performance across industries. These bots offer win rates, returns, and risk metrics tailored to varying trader preferences, helping users identify opportunities in volatile environments. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see real-time signals and backtested stats for enhanced decision-making.
Head-to-Head Comparison
While both FUL and SHW thrive in specialty chemicals, FUL emphasizes industrial adhesives for manufacturing and construction, contrasting SHW's focus on consumer paints and coatings tied to housing cycles. Growth drivers differ: FUL benefits from restructuring savings and global sourcing, while SHW leverages its vast retail network but contends with commodity inflation. Recent momentum tilts to FUL, with superior YTD returns and valuation, versus SHW's scale advantages. Risk factors include volume softness for FUL and demand sensitivity for SHW, with market sentiment favoring stability in earnings execution over size alone.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor FUL over SHW based on stronger trend consistency, recent earnings outperformance, dividend growth, and attractive relative valuation. FUL's momentum and margin resilience position it better amid sector headwinds, though SHW could regain ground post-earnings if catalysts emerge.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and SHW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SHW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SHW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while SHW (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -1.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 24, 2026.
SHW is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.31% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| FUL | SHW | FUL / SHW | |
| Capitalization | 3.5B | 78.2B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 541M | 4.56B | 12% |
| Gain YTD | 8.986 | -1.730 | -519% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.25 | 30.44 | 73% |
| Revenue | 3.46B | 23.9B | 14% |
| Total Cash | 108M | 217M | 50% |
| Total Debt | 2.08B | 13.8B | 15% |
FUL | SHW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (37) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHW (88). This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHW’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (97). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's SMR Rating (18) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (77). This means that SHW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SHW (51). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SHW’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (72). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | SHW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 59% | 22 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
SHW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHW has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHW jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHW | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| RPM - SHW | 75% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| PPG - SHW | 73% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| AXTA - SHW | 66% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| AVNT - SHW | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| FUL - SHW | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More | ||||