FUL vs SQM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SQM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SQM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -4.55% price change this week, while SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -4.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.
SQM is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.40% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| FUL | SQM | FUL / SQM | |
| Capitalization | 4.35B | 14B | 31% |
| EBITDA | 540M | 2.94B | 18% |
| Gain YTD | -2.156 | -41.809 | 5% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.70 | 6.95 | 413% |
| Revenue | 3.51B | 7.47B | 47% |
| Total Cash | 165M | 2.36B | 7% |
| Total Debt | 1.83B | 4.49B | 41% |
FUL | SQM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL's Valuation (77) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SQM (83) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQM (74) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's SMR Rating (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SQM (89) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SQM (84) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.
SQM's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (45) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 74% |
FUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| CE - SQM | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| AVNT - SQM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| NGVT - SQM | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| EMN - SQM | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||