FULT
Price
$17.62
Change
-$0.33 (-1.84%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
80 days until earnings call
WSFS
Price
$53.76
Change
-$1.08 (-1.97%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
2.71B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs WSFS

Header iconFULT vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs WSFSBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$17.62
Change-$0.33 (-1.84%)
Volume$2.42M
Capitalization2.57B
WSFS Financial
Price$53.76
Change-$1.08 (-1.97%)
Volume$441.54K
Capitalization2.71B
FULT vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. WSFS commentary
Aug 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Hold and WSFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $17.62 vs. WSFS: $53.76)
Brand notoriety: FULT and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 165% vs. WSFS: 130%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $2.57B vs. WSFS: $2.71B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.57B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than WSFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FULT and WSFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.27% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.81% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($2.71B) has a higher market cap than FULT($2.57B). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than FULT: WSFS (10.04) vs FULT (9.54). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 1.763 vs. FULT (-6.761). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. FULT (304M). WSFS has less debt than FULT: WSFS (895M) vs FULT (1.64B). FULT has higher revenues than WSFS: FULT (1.08B) vs WSFS (1.02B).
FULTWSFSFULT / WSFS
Capitalization2.57B2.71B95%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.7611.763-383%
P/E Ratio9.5410.0495%
Revenue1.08B1.02B107%
Total Cash304M606M50%
Total Debt1.64B895M183%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5860
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3535
SMR RATING
1..100
1111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (62) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (35) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (11) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIECX19.03N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV International Equity C
EDIAX11.20N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder A
CCCRX38.42N/A
N/A
Columbia Contrarian Core R
STRLX59.73N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital MdCp Relatv Val A
FCIHX16.66-0.05
-0.30%
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P