FUNC
Price
$29.78
Change
+$0.28 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
152.19M
52 days until earnings call
PNFP
Price
$107.54
Change
+$2.01 (+1.90%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.62B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUNC vs PNFP

Header iconFUNC vs PNFP Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs PNFPBanner chart's image
First United
Price$29.78
Change+$0.28 (+0.95%)
Volume$100
Capitalization152.19M
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$107.54
Change+$2.01 (+1.90%)
Volume$257
Capitalization6.62B
FUNC vs PNFP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. PNFP commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Hold and PNFP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $29.50 vs. PNFP: $105.53)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 58% vs. PNFP: 53%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $152.19M vs. PNFP: $6.62B
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $152.19M. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than PNFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than PNFP.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.54% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than FUNC($152M). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: PNFP (11.70) vs FUNC (10.14). PNFP YTD gains are higher at: -7.353 vs. FUNC (-11.206). PNFP has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. FUNC (86.9M). FUNC has less debt than PNFP: FUNC (112M) vs PNFP (2.56B). PNFP has higher revenues than FUNC: PNFP (1.38B) vs FUNC (71.3M).
FUNCPNFPFUNC / PNFP
Capitalization152M6.62B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-11.206-7.353152%
P/E Ratio10.1411.7087%
Revenue71.3M1.38B5%
Total Cash86.9M229M38%
Total Debt112M2.56B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5867
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3636
SMR RATING
1..100
168
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6315
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (83). This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (36). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (16). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (57). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (63). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLIA20.39-0.07
-0.34%
Franklin International Aggregate Bd ETF
VSDA50.50-0.37
-0.72%
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
UNL9.16-0.07
-0.76%
United States 12 Month Natural Gas
GDXD2.92-0.04
-1.35%
MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN
UPRO81.11-1.24
-1.51%
ProShares UltraPro S&P500

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.27%
HTBK - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
EFSC - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
PNFP - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
UCB - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
SHBI - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
-0.26%
SNV - PNFP
93%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
FNB - PNFP
92%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
ONB - PNFP
91%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
WTFC - PNFP
91%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
ASB - PNFP
91%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
More