FUNC
Price
$27.68
Change
+$0.39 (+1.43%)
Updated
Apr 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
152.19M
15 days until earnings call
PNFP
Price
$94.36
Change
+$2.16 (+2.34%)
Updated
Apr 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.62B
98 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FUNC vs PNFP

Header iconFUNC vs PNFP Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs PNFPBanner chart's image
First United
Price$27.68
Change+$0.39 (+1.43%)
Volume$500
Capitalization152.19M
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$94.36
Change+$2.16 (+2.34%)
Volume$21.79K
Capitalization6.62B
FUNC vs PNFP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. PNFP commentary
Apr 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a StrongBuy and PNFP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $27.29 vs. PNFP: $92.20)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 66% vs. PNFP: 198%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $152.19M vs. PNFP: $6.62B
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $152.19M. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than PNFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than PNFP.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.37% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than FUNC($152M). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: PNFP (11.70) vs FUNC (10.14). FUNC (-18.502) and PNFP (-19.245) have similar YTD gains . PNFP has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. FUNC (86.9M). FUNC has less debt than PNFP: FUNC (112M) vs PNFP (2.56B). PNFP has higher revenues than FUNC: PNFP (1.38B) vs FUNC (71.3M).
FUNCPNFPFUNC / PNFP
Capitalization152M6.62B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.502-19.24596%
P/E Ratio10.1411.7087%
Revenue71.3M1.38B5%
Total Cash86.9M229M38%
Total Debt112M2.56B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1181
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3438
SMR RATING
1..100
178
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (83). This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (38). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (17). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (61). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (61). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESGE33.740.33
+0.99%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
UGA56.900.52
+0.92%
United States Gasoline
INDY50.230.25
+0.50%
iShares India 50 ETF
FTSD90.610.25
+0.28%
Franklin Short Duration US Govt ETF
QLVE24.62N/A
N/A
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.92%
EFSC - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
UCB - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
CFG - FUNC
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
ZION - FUNC
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
PNFP - FUNC
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
More

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
+2.40%
SNV - PNFP
91%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
ONB - PNFP
91%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
ZION - PNFP
90%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
FNB - PNFP
90%
Closely correlated
+2.29%
SSB - PNFP
90%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
More