FUNC
Price
$32.32
Change
-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
89 days until earnings call
QCRH
Price
$78.25
Change
+$0.12 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:37 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
994.31M
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FUNC vs QCRH

Header iconFUNC vs QCRH Comparison
Open Charts FUNC vs QCRHBanner chart's image
First United
Price$32.32
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$17.72K
Capitalization152.19M
QCR Holdings
Price$78.25
Change+$0.12 (+0.15%)
Volume$400
Capitalization994.31M
FUNC vs QCRH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUNC vs. QCRH commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Buy and QCRH is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (FUNC: $32.32 vs. QCRH: $78.13)
Brand notoriety: FUNC and QCRH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUNC: 70% vs. QCRH: 77%
Market capitalization -- FUNC: $152.19M vs. QCRH: $994.31M
FUNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $152.19M. QCRH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $994.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQCRH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QCRH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than QCRH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCRH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QCRH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than QCRH.

Price Growth

FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.19% price change this week, while QCRH (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

QCRH is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCRH($994M) has a higher market cap than FUNC($152M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than QCRH: FUNC (10.14) vs QCRH (8.80). QCRH YTD gains are higher at: -3.113 vs. FUNC (-3.481). QCRH has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. FUNC (86.9M). FUNC has less debt than QCRH: FUNC (112M) vs QCRH (717M). QCRH has higher revenues than FUNC: QCRH (343M) vs FUNC (71.3M).
FUNCQCRHFUNC / QCRH
Capitalization152M994M15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.481-3.113112%
P/E Ratio10.148.80115%
Revenue71.3M343M21%
Total Cash86.9M104M84%
Total Debt112M717M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUNC vs QCRH: Fundamental Ratings
FUNC
QCRH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
367
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2922
SMR RATING
1..100
4317
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as QCRH (75). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to QCRH’s over the last 12 months.

QCRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (29). This means that QCRH’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

QCRH's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (43). This means that QCRH’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as QCRH (51). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to QCRH’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as QCRH (25). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to QCRH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNCQCRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMPFX103.89N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Growth FI
CISAX7.65N/A
N/A
Copeland International Small Cap A
HWMAX55.82N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value A
MFWLX16.43N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return R6
NSIVX11.03N/A
N/A
North Square Altrinsic Intl Eq I

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.06%
EFSC - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
NWBI - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
SASR - FUNC
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
CCNE - FUNC
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
QCRH - FUNC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
More

QCRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCRH has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCRH jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCRH
1D Price
Change %
QCRH100%
-0.32%
THFF - QCRH
89%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
UBSI - QCRH
88%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
NWBI - QCRH
87%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
BUSE - QCRH
87%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
FCBC - QCRH
87%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
More