Ad is loading...
FVCAX vs MSODX
FVCAX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts FVCAX vs MSODX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal Adv
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Class R6
Price$9.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FVCAX vs MSODX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVCAX vs. MSODX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVCAX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FVCAX has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. MSODX (1.24B). FVCAX pays higher dividends than MSODX: FVCAX (4.25) vs MSODX (3.84). FVCAX was incepted earlier than MSODX: FVCAX (18 years) vs MSODX (5 years). FVCAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than MSODX (0.48). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FVCAX (10.93). FVCAX (0) and MSODX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.24 vs. MSODX (0.83). MSODX return over 5 years is better than : 5.94 vs. FVCAX (2.99).
| FVCAX | MSODX | FVCAX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.48 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.48 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.530 | -2.823 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 1.24B | 234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.25 | 3.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.24 | 0.83 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.88 | 7.47 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.99 | 5.94 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.15 | N/A | - |