Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVIPX vs RHLTX
FVIPX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVIPX vs. RHLTX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVIPX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHLTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. FVIPX (2.93B). FVIPX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: FVIPX (1.93) vs RHLTX (1.01). FVIPX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FVIPX (5 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). RHLTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FVIPX (0.06). FVIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. RHLTX (4.00). RHLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FVIPX: RHLTX (250) vs FVIPX (2000000000). FVIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.28 vs. RHLTX (8.76).
| FVIPX | RHLTX | FVIPX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.53 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.53 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.507 | 3.381 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 250 | 800,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 4.43B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.01 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.28 | 8.76 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.53 | 35.20 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 64.36 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |