Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVTKX vs RHKTX
FVTKX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVTKX vs. RHKTX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVTKX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. FVTKX (6.92B). FVTKX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FVTKX (1.51) vs RHKTX (0.94). FVTKX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FVTKX (8 years) vs RHKTX (10 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FVTKX (0.45). FVTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). FVTKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHKTX: FVTKX (0) vs RHKTX (250). RHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.13 vs. FVTKX (14.24). RHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.87 vs. FVTKX (44.95).
| FVTKX | RHKTX | FVTKX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.53 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.53 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.050 | 11.854 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.92B | 17.3B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.94 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.24 | 15.13 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.87 | 38.06 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.95 | 47.87 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement