Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVTKX vs RHKTX
FVTKX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVTKX vs. RHKTX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVTKX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. FVTKX (6.52B). FVTKX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FVTKX (1.58) vs RHKTX (0.99). FVTKX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FVTKX (8 years) vs RHKTX (10 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FVTKX (0.46). FVTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). FVTKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHKTX: FVTKX (0) vs RHKTX (250). RHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. FVTKX (8.86). RHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. FVTKX (46.70).
| FVTKX | RHKTX | FVTKX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.456 | 6.685 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.52B | 16.4B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.99 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.86 | 10.00 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.24 | 41.35 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.70 | 50.57 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers