Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVTKX vs RHKTX
FVTKX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVTKX vs. RHKTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVTKX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. FVTKX (6.12B). FVTKX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FVTKX (1.66) vs RHKTX (1.05). FVTKX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FVTKX (8 years) vs RHKTX (10 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FVTKX (0.46). FVTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). FVTKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHKTX: FVTKX (0) vs RHKTX (250). RHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.32 vs. FVTKX (7.86). RHKTX (51.07) and FVTKX (50.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FVTKX | RHKTX | FVTKX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.315 | 3.427 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.12B | 15.9B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.05 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 8.32 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.34 | 30.03 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.96 | 51.07 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers