Ad is loading...
FWCBX vs GBPAX
FWCBX vs GBPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBPAX (37M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than GBPAX: FWCBX (3.41) vs GBPAX (1.90). FWCBX was incepted earlier than GBPAX: FWCBX (5 years) vs GBPAX (9 years). GBPAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.32). GBPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FWCBX (56.00). FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBPAX: FWCBX (250) vs GBPAX (2500). FWCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. GBPAX (-4.47).
| FWCBX | GBPAX | FWCBX / GBPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.59 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.59 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.070 | 3.406 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 37M | 297,297% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 1.90 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | -4.47 | -235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.00 | 16.25 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 25.96 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |