Ad is loading...
FWD vs TRFM
FWD vs TRFM Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TRFM
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$80.96
Change+$0.31 (+0.38%)
Volume$226
Net Assets671.85M
AAM Transformers ETF
Price$40.00
Change+$0.14 (+0.35%)
Volume$283
Net Assets58.79M
FWD vs TRFM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TRFM commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a StrongBuy and TRFM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 672M vs. TRFM (58.8M). TRFM has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: TRFM (5.035) vs FWD (1.844). FWD was incepted earlier than TRFM: FWD (2 years) vs TRFM (3 years). TRFM (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover TRFM (84.00) vs TRFM (84.00).
| FWD | TRFM | FWD / TRFM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.844 | 5.035 | 37% |
| Net Assets | 672M | 58.8M | 1,143% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 84.00 | 194% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TRFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +2.30% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +4.66% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +3.88% | ||
| SNPS - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +3.65% | ||
More | ||||
TRFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRFM has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRFM jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRFM | 100% | +2.39% | ||
| APH - TRFM | 79% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| ARM - TRFM | 74% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| GEV - TRFM | 71% Closely correlated | +4.01% | ||
| TSEM - TRFM | 71% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| CLS - TRFM | 70% Closely correlated | +9.52% | ||
More | ||||