Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SLCAX
FWWMX vs SLCAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SLCAX
FWWMX vs SLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SLCAX (640M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SLCAX: FWWMX (1.40) vs SLCAX (1.11). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SLCAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SLCAX (30 years). SLCAX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). SLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLCAX: FWWMX (250) vs SLCAX (100000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. SLCAX (-10.62). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.63 vs. SLCAX (-19.66).
| FWWMX | SLCAX | FWWMX / SLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.378 | 10.213 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 640M | 34,063% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.11 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | -10.62 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.89 | 6.16 | 485% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.63 | -19.66 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -10.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement