Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs HHHCX
FWWNX vs HHHCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs HHHCX
American Funds New World 529-F-3
Price$88.38
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.85B
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq C
Price$18.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
FWWNX vs HHHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. HHHCX (5.73B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than HHHCX: FWWNX (1.09) vs HHHCX (0.04). FWWNX was incepted earlier than HHHCX: FWWNX (5 years) vs HHHCX (9 years). HHHCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.63). HHHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. FWWNX (37.00). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHHCX: FWWNX (250) vs HHHCX (2000). HHHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.11 vs. FWWNX (11.51).
| FWWNX | HHHCX | FWWNX / HHHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.05 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.303 | 14.432 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8B | 5.73B | 1,218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.04 | 2,716% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 12.11 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.02 | 25.02 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 28.92 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement