Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs MCSSX
FXAIX vs MCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MCSSX
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Investor Class
Price$37.78
Change-$0.82 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.33M
FXAIX vs MCSSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MCSSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MCSSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. MCSSX (507M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: FXAIX (1.30) vs MCSSX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MCSSX: FXAIX (14 years) vs MCSSX (17 years). MCSSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSSX: FXAIX (0) vs MCSSX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. MCSSX (3.37). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 111.09 vs. MCSSX (78.90).
| FXAIX | MCSSX | FXAIX / MCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.17 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.17 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.913 | -0.631 | 1,095% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 507M | 117,949% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 3.37 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.44 | 15.51 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.09 | 78.90 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.32 | 90.14 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...