Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 833B vs. NSBCX (6.34B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.06) vs NSBCX (0.08). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.55 vs. NSBCX (-1.62). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.96 vs. NSBCX (19.68).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.128 | 2.012 | 503% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833B | 6.34B | 13,137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.08 | 1,277% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.55 | -1.62 | -1,204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.29 | 15.98 | 440% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.96 | 19.68 | 422% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.67 | 84.19 | 338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement