Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NSBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. NSBCX (6.47B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs NSBCX (0.14). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.57 vs. NSBCX (-0.56). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.64 vs. NSBCX (20.66).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.562 | 0.134 | 8,638% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832B | 6.47B | 12,861% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.14 | 716% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.57 | -0.56 | -5,235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.73 | 20.56 | 412% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.64 | 20.66 | 458% |
| Returns for 10 years | 301.46 | 84.46 | 357% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement