Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs NWABX
FXAIX vs NWABX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NWABX
FXAIX vs NWABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NWABX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NWABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. NWABX (1.62B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NWABX: FXAIX (1.34) vs NWABX (0.51). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NWABX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NWABX (7 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.61 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: FXAIX (0) vs NWABX (1000000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. NWABX (-3.80). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.31 vs. NWABX (40.91).
| FXAIX | NWABX | FXAIX / NWABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.55 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.872 | -3.741 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 1.62B | 36,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.51 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | -3.80 | -263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 17.61 | 271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.31 | 40.91 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...