Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs REQCX
FXAIX vs REQCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs REQCX
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq C
Price$39.88
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.66M
FXAIX vs REQCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. REQCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and REQCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. REQCX (156M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than REQCX: FXAIX (1.34) vs REQCX (0.29). FXAIX was incepted earlier than REQCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs REQCX (17 years). REQCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). REQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and REQCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. REQCX (-8.56). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 108.40 vs. REQCX (-14.40).
| FXAIX | REQCX | FXAIX / REQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.14 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.24 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.366 | -3.251 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 156M | 380,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.29 | 461% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | -8.56 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.07 | -5.57 | -863% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.40 | -14.40 | -753% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.80 | -15.01 | -1,297% |