Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FYC vs IWO
FYC vs IWO Comparison
Open Charts FYC vs IWO
First Trust Small Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$76.83
Change+$1.50 (+1.99%)
Volume$387
Net Assets443.43M
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Price$280.10
Change+$3.89 (+1.41%)
Volume$200
Net Assets11.26B
FYC vs IWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FYC vs. IWO commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYC is a StrongBuy and IWO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWO has more net assets: 11.3B vs. FYC (443M). FYC has a higher annual dividend yield than IWO: FYC (-2.712) vs IWO (-3.895). FYC was incepted earlier than IWO: FYC (14 years) vs IWO (25 years). IWO (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than FYC (0.71). FYC has a higher turnover IWO (34.00) vs IWO (34.00).
| FYC | IWO | FYC / IWO | |
| Gain YTD | -2.712 | -3.895 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 443M | 11.3B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.24 | 296% |
| Turnover | 141.00 | 34.00 | 415% |
| Yield | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FYC | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYC has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYC jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYC | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| ENVA - FYC | 81% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| TPG - FYC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| KN - FYC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| VCTR - FYC | 78% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| CTS - FYC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
IWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y