Analysis and predictions FYC vs LADR
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYC is a Hold and LADR is a Hold.
LADR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FYC | LADR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PPNPX | 12.65 | 0.03 | +0.24% |
| Principal SmallCap Growth I R5 | |||
| MEURX | 24.69 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Franklin Mutual International Value Z | |||
| LBDRX | 19.91 | -0.09 | -0.45% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R | |||
| JGQIX | 15.33 | -0.11 | -0.71% |
| Jensen Global Quality Growth I | |||
| EGFIX | 46.06 | -0.43 | -0.92% |
| Edgewood Growth Instl | |||
FYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYC has been closely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYC jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYC | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| VCYT - FYC | 69% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| IIPR - FYC | 69% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| HEES - FYC | 68% Closely correlated | -7.25% | ||
| QTWO - FYC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| TWST - FYC | 67% Closely correlated | +2.31% | ||
More | ||||
LADR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LADR has been closely correlated with BRSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LADR jumps, then BRSP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LADR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LADR | 100% | +1.58% | ||
| BRSP - LADR | 81% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| STWD - LADR | 78% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| RC - LADR | 78% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| BXMT - LADR | 78% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ACRE - LADR | 76% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
More | ||||