FYC vs QTWO ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYC is a Hold and QTWO is a Sell.
QTWO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 32 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FYC | QTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSCOX | 6.72 | 0.02 | +0.30% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Inception C | |||
| SNOCX | 30.67 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| Easterly Snow Long/Short Opportunity C | |||
| CSMUX | 23.23 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
| Carillon Scout Mid Cap R-6 | |||
| RICGX | 53.50 | -0.11 | -0.21% |
| American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R6 | |||
| FFGAX | 18.87 | -0.16 | -0.84% |
| Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk A | |||
FYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYC has been closely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYC jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYC | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| VCYT - FYC | 69% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| IIPR - FYC | 69% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| HEES - FYC | 68% Closely correlated | -7.25% | ||
| QTWO - FYC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| TWST - FYC | 67% Closely correlated | +2.31% | ||
More | ||||
QTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| COIN - QTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| NCNO - QTWO | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| BL - QTWO | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| ALKT - QTWO | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ACIW - QTWO | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||