FYMNF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.56M
PVGDF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.01 (-6.25%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
7.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FYMNF vs PVGDF

Header iconFYMNF vs PVGDF Comparison
Open Charts FYMNF vs PVGDFBanner chart's image
Finlay Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.8K
Capitalization2.56M
Provenance Gold
Price$0.15
Change-$0.01 (-6.25%)
Volume$10.2K
Capitalization7.2M
FYMNF vs PVGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYMNF vs. PVGDF commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYMNF is a Hold and PVGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FYMNF: $0.07 vs. PVGDF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: FYMNF and PVGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYMNF: 50% vs. PVGDF: 8%
Market capitalization -- FYMNF: $2.56M vs. PVGDF: $7.2M
FYMNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.56M. PVGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYMNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePVGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FYMNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PVGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PVGDF is a better buy in the long-term than FYMNF.

Price Growth

FYMNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while PVGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.95% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PVGDF($7.2M) has a higher market cap than FYMNF($2.56M). FYMNF YTD gains are higher at: 325.714 vs. PVGDF (-20.706). PVGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -667.39K vs. FYMNF (-1.02M). FYMNF has more cash in the bank: 1.8M vs. PVGDF (103K). FYMNF (0) and PVGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FYMNFPVGDFFYMNF / PVGDF
Capitalization2.56M7.2M35%
EBITDA-1.02M-667.39K153%
Gain YTD325.714-20.706-1,573%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.8M103K1,750%
Total DebtN/A47.5K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FYMNF: Fundamental Ratings
FYMNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PVGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IENRX9.290.04
+0.43%
Macquarie Climate Solutions R6
BRXVX15.060.06
+0.40%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R6
VMNFX13.550.01
+0.07%
Vanguard Market Neutral Inv
FSIUX25.89-0.05
-0.19%
Invesco Dividend Income R5
CAFAX41.82-0.35
-0.83%
American Funds AMCAP 529A

FYMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FYMNF and BONXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FYMNF and BONXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYMNF
1D Price
Change %
FYMNF100%
+0.13%
BONXF - FYMNF
28%
Poorly correlated
+8.33%
PVGDF - FYMNF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
BTLLF - FYMNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNL - FYMNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.07%
ODV - FYMNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More

PVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PVGDF and AUCCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PVGDF and AUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PVGDF
1D Price
Change %
PVGDF100%
-3.34%
AUCCF - PVGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGG - PVGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.42%
FYMNF - PVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
OCGSF - PVGDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.89%
RSNVF - PVGDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
More