FYMNF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.02 (+200.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.56M
PVGDF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.2M
Ad is loading...

FYMNF vs PVGDF

Header iconFYMNF vs PVGDF Comparison
Open Charts FYMNF vs PVGDFBanner chart's image
Finlay Minerals
Price$0.03
Change+$0.02 (+200.00%)
Volume$44.3K
Capitalization2.56M
Provenance Gold
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$145K
Capitalization7.2M
FYMNF vs PVGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FYMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYMNF vs. PVGDF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYMNF is a Hold and PVGDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FYMNF: $0.03 vs. PVGDF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: FYMNF and PVGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYMNF: 355% vs. PVGDF: 88%
Market capitalization -- FYMNF: $2.56M vs. PVGDF: $7.2M
FYMNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.56M. PVGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYMNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePVGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FYMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PVGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FYMNF and PVGDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYMNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PVGDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FYMNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PVGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PVGDF is a better buy in the short-term than FYMNF.

Price Growth

FYMNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +80.60% price change this week, while PVGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PVGDF($7.2M) has a higher market cap than FYMNF($2.56M). FYMNF YTD gains are higher at: 54.286 vs. PVGDF (0.421). PVGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -667.39K vs. FYMNF (-1.02M). FYMNF has more cash in the bank: 1.8M vs. PVGDF (103K). FYMNF (0) and PVGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FYMNFPVGDFFYMNF / PVGDF
Capitalization2.56M7.2M35%
EBITDA-1.02M-667.39K153%
Gain YTD54.2860.42112,879%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.8M103K1,750%
Total DebtN/A47.5K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FYMNF: Fundamental Ratings
FYMNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FYMNFPVGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FYMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRUIX157.731.57
+1.01%
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 I
QGRPX17.420.16
+0.93%
UBS US Quality Growth At Rsnbl Prc P
SBPYX40.75N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth I
MXEVX10.22N/A
N/A
Empower Core Strategies Intl Eq Inv
HFAFX12.38N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val R5

FYMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FYMNF and BONXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FYMNF and BONXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYMNF
1D Price
Change %
FYMNF100%
+80.60%
BONXF - FYMNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PVGDF - FYMNF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
BTLLF - FYMNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.34%
DOLLF - FYMNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
CNL - FYMNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
More

PVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PVGDF and AUCCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PVGDF and AUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PVGDF
1D Price
Change %
PVGDF100%
-0.47%
AUCCF - PVGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGG - PVGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.23%
FYMNF - PVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+80.60%
OCGSF - PVGDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
RSNVF - PVGDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More