Ad is loading...
FYMNX vs IMNTX
FYMNX vs IMNTX Comparison
Open Charts FYMNX vs IMNTX
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond I
Price$10.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt A
Price$18.94
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets472.86M
FYMNX vs IMNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FYMNX vs. IMNTX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYMNX is a Hold and IMNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYMNX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. IMNTX (473M). FYMNX pays higher dividends than IMNTX: FYMNX (3.79) vs IMNTX (3.23). FYMNX was incepted earlier than IMNTX: FYMNX (28 years) vs IMNTX (39 years). IMNTX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FYMNX (0.59). FYMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. IMNTX (10.00). IMNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FYMNX: IMNTX (2000) vs FYMNX (100000). FYMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. IMNTX (0.54). FYMNX return over 5 years is better than : 4.23 vs. IMNTX (-0.24).
| FYMNX | IMNTX | FYMNX / IMNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.81 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.81 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.577 | -2.207 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 653M | 473M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 3.23 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.86 | 0.54 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.33 | 5.18 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.23 | -0.24 | -1,770% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.36 | 12.65 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers