Ad is loading...
FZAFX vs RGAGX
FZAFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$20.55
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.76B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$66.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
FZAFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. FZAFX (10.8B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGAGX (0.71) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FZAFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FZAFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.24 vs. FZAFX (-8.61). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.82 vs. RGAGX (38.81).
| FZAFX | RGAGX | FZAFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.30 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.805 | -11.053 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 261B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.61 | -3.24 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.41 | 5.77 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.82 | 38.81 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.25 | 51.01 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers