Ad is loading...
FZITX vs NMBAX
FZITX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts FZITX vs NMBAX
Fidelity Advisor Interm Muni Inc M
Price$10.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.23B
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.74B
FZITX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZITX vs. NMBAX commentary
Mar 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZITX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FZITX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. NMBAX (7.74B). NMBAX pays higher dividends than FZITX: NMBAX (2.68) vs FZITX (2.22). FZITX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: FZITX (19 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). NMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FZITX (14.00). FZITX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: FZITX (0) vs NMBAX (3000). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.38 vs. FZITX (2.43). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.36 vs. FZITX (2.74).
| FZITX | NMBAX | FZITX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.204 | 1.886 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 7.74B | 158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.22 | 2.68 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.43 | 3.38 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.36 | 3.08 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.74 | 3.36 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.48 | 15.04 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...