Ad is loading...
GAFFX vs GGRCX
GAFFX vs GGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs GGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$66.28
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.27B
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$12.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.81M
GAFFX vs GGRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. GGRCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and GGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. GGRCX (164M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: GAFFX (0.72) vs GGRCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than GGRCX: GAFFX (8 years) vs GGRCX (26 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). GGRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: GGRCX (1000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.00 vs. GAFFX (-2.52). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.87 vs. GGRCX (-15.06).
| GAFFX | GGRCX | GAFFX / GGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.78 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.07 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.998 | -15.583 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 164M | 159,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.01 | 2.55 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.87 | -15.06 | -258% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -61.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...