Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs GGRCX
GAFFX vs GGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs GGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$78.29
Change-$0.28 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.93B
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$14.81
Change-$0.11 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.01M
GAFFX vs GGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. GGRCX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a StrongBuy and GGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. GGRCX (193M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: GAFFX (0.65) vs GGRCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than GGRCX: GAFFX (8 years) vs GGRCX (26 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). GGRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: GGRCX (1000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. GAFFX (6.83). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.99 vs. GGRCX (-10.23).
| GAFFX | GGRCX | GAFFX / GGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.78 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.07 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.130 | 1.084 | 473% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 193M | 159,067% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.83 | 7.88 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.91 | 50.55 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.99 | -10.23 | -450% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -53.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement