Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs ZVNBX
GAFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$83.69
Change-$0.12 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.7B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.04M
GAFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a StrongBuy and ZVNBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 326B vs. ZVNBX (147M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GAFFX (0.61) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GAFFX (8 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). ZVNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: ZVNBX (2500) vs GAFFX (1000000). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.89 vs. GAFFX (13.15). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.38 vs. ZVNBX (37.04).
| GAFFX | ZVNBX | GAFFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.52 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.542 | 11.287 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326B | 147M | 221,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.15 | 31.89 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.51 | 120.42 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.38 | 37.04 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement