GAMB vs RVLCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAMB is a Hold and RVLCF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GAMB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GAMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RVLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GAMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GAMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RVLCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
GAMB (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +10.25% price change this week, while RVLCF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +5.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
GAMB is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-3.16% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| GAMB | RVLCF | GAMB / RVLCF | |
| Capitalization | 346M | 64M | 541% |
| EBITDA | 23.1M | -27.6M | -84% |
| Gain YTD | 63.590 | -85.106 | -75% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.77 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 109M | 33.8M | 322% |
| Total Cash | 25.4M | 8.54M | 297% |
| Total Debt | 1.72M | 481K | 358% |
| GAMB | RVLCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 30% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 32% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPOAX | 42.26 | 0.14 | +0.33% |
| Morgan Stanley Insight A | |||
| MSULX | 9.66 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley Inst US Real Estate L | |||
| HDAVX | 15.59 | -0.03 | -0.19% |
| Janus Henderson Responsible Intl Div A | |||
| INFFX | 9.08 | -0.06 | -0.66% |
| Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and Inc C | |||
| VSMIX | 26.55 | -0.41 | -1.52% |
| Invesco Small Cap Value Y | |||
GAMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAMB has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAMB jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GAMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAMB | 100% | +3.57% | ||
| CZR - GAMB | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| GEBHF - GAMB | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MCRI - GAMB | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| WYNN - GAMB | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.54% | ||
| INSE - GAMB | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||
RVLCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLCF and RANKF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLCF and RANKF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RVLCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RVLCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RANKF - RVLCF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JPOTF - RVLCF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GAMB - RVLCF | 1% Poorly correlated | -8.28% | ||
| CDRO - RVLCF | 0% Poorly correlated | -3.13% | ||
| BTSBF - RVLCF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||