GBBK
Price
$11.24
Change
+$0.21 (+1.90%)
Updated
Dec 17, 10:30 AM (EDT)
MANDF
Price
$4.50
Change
+$0.38 (+9.22%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

GBBK vs MANDF

Header iconGBBK vs MANDF Comparison
Open Charts GBBK vs MANDFBanner chart's image
Global Blockchain Acquisition
Price$11.24
Change+$0.21 (+1.90%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MANDATUM OYJ
Price$4.50
Change+$0.38 (+9.22%)
Volume$145
CapitalizationN/A
GBBK vs MANDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GBBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBBK vs. MANDF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBBK is a StrongSell and MANDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GBBK: $11.03 vs. MANDF: $4.50)
Brand notoriety: GBBK and MANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBBK: 2% vs. MANDF: 64%
Market capitalization -- GBBK: $77.53M vs. MANDF: $2.28B
GBBK [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $77.53M. MANDF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMANDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GBBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MANDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the long-term than GBBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBBK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBBK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MANDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GBBK and MANDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GBBK (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MANDF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

GBBK is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.78% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANDF($2.28B) has a higher market cap than GBBK($77.5M). GBBK has higher P/E ratio than MANDF: GBBK (49.05) vs MANDF (13.36). GBBK YTD gains are higher at: 4.550 vs. MANDF (2.273). MANDF has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. GBBK (498K). MANDF has higher revenues than GBBK: MANDF (1.71B) vs GBBK (0).
GBBKMANDFGBBK / MANDF
Capitalization77.5M2.28B3%
EBITDA-1.27MN/A-
Gain YTD4.5502.273200%
P/E Ratio49.0513.36367%
Revenue01.71B-
Total Cash498K1.12B0%
Total DebtN/A549M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBBKMANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GBBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGORX21.61N/A
N/A
RBC Global Opportunities R6
PAIOX8.45N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps R6
IVGSX22.39-0.60
-2.61%
VY® Invesco Growth and Income S
MUERX32.74-0.96
-2.85%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R1
TMCJX49.10-1.78
-3.50%
Touchstone Mid Cap C

GBBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBBK has been loosely correlated with BNIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBBK jumps, then BNIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBBK
1D Price
Change %
GBBK100%
N/A
BNIX - GBBK
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ONYX - GBBK
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WAVSU - GBBK
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TGAAU - GBBK
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NPAB - GBBK
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

MANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MANDF has been loosely correlated with KACLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MANDF jumps, then KACLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANDF
1D Price
Change %
MANDF100%
N/A
KACLU - MANDF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GBBK - MANDF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - MANDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MARXU - MANDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-12.56%
IPXX - MANDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More