GBBLF vs HPMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBBLF is a Hold and HPMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GBBLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHPMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GBBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HPMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
GBBLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HPMCF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +10.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-0.30% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| GBBLF | HPMCF | GBBLF / HPMCF | |
| Capitalization | 24.1M | 112M | 22% |
| EBITDA | -7.9M | -20.53M | 38% |
| Gain YTD | -47.600 | -76.500 | 62% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.25 | - |
| Revenue | 34.8K | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 3.14M | 2.66M | 118% |
| Total Debt | 64.7K | 5M | 1% |
GBBLF | HPMCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HPMCF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBBLF (100). This means that HPMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBBLF’s over the last 12 months.
HPMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBLF (100). This means that HPMCF’s stock grew similarly to GBBLF’s over the last 12 months.
GBBLF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as HPMCF (97). This means that GBBLF’s stock grew similarly to HPMCF’s over the last 12 months.
HPMCF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBLF (94). This means that HPMCF’s stock grew similarly to GBBLF’s over the last 12 months.
HPMCF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBLF (100). This means that HPMCF’s stock grew similarly to GBBLF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
GBBLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GBBLF and HPMCF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBBLF and HPMCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBBLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBBLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HPMCF - GBBLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GVLMF - GBBLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GEGYF - GBBLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GUKYF - GBBLF | -0% Poorly correlated | +22.50% | ||
| GXRFF - GBBLF | -2% Poorly correlated | +9.96% | ||
More | ||||
HPMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HPMCF and WMELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HPMCF and WMELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HPMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPMCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WMELF - HPMCF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GUKYF - HPMCF | 13% Poorly correlated | +22.50% | ||
| GENGF - HPMCF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| GULTU - HPMCF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.65% | ||
| GBBLF - HPMCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||