Ad is loading...
GBEMX vs RNWFX
GBEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GBEMX vs RNWFX
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets A
Price$19.25
Change+$0.24 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.09M
American Funds New World R5
Price$76.20
Change+$0.48 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.57B
GBEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 59.6B vs. GBEMX (279M). GBEMX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: GBEMX (1.94) vs RNWFX (1.17). GBEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GBEMX (28 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). GBEMX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). GBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBEMX: RNWFX (250) vs GBEMX (2500). GBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.39 vs. RNWFX (0.78). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. GBEMX (22.57).
| GBEMX | RNWFX | GBEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.62 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.62 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.575 | -1.372 | 42% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 59.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.17 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.39 | 0.78 | 308% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.27 | 5.03 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.57 | 33.58 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.55 | 39.74 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers