Ad is loading...
GBFAX vs RNWFX
GBFAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GBFAX vs RNWFX
VanEck Emerging Markets A
Price$13.56
Change+$0.18 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets396.24M
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.78
Change+$0.64 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.4B
GBFAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBFAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFAX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.4B vs. GBFAX (396M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GBFAX: RNWFX (1.51) vs GBFAX (1.13). GBFAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GBFAX (31 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. GBFAX (11.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBFAX: RNWFX (250) vs GBFAX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.74 vs. GBFAX (5.73). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.62 vs. GBFAX (-17.96).
| GBFAX | RNWFX | GBFAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.494 | 3.262 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 63.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.51 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.73 | 8.74 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.49 | 1.44 | -730% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.96 | 19.62 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.97 | 53.03 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...