GBNXF vs TWMIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBNXF is a Hold and TWMIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GBNXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTWMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GBNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TWMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
GBNXF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +4.04% price change this week, while TWMIF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +9.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.52%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+4.84% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| GBNXF | TWMIF | GBNXF / TWMIF | |
| Capitalization | 2.2B | 269M | 816% |
| EBITDA | 541M | -254.5M | -213% |
| Gain YTD | 12.213 | -88.421 | -14% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.88 | 42.92 | 25% |
| Revenue | 10.7B | 2.21B | 485% |
| Total Cash | 40.6M | 337M | 12% |
| Total Debt | 1.65B | 769M | 214% |
GBNXF | TWMIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GBNXF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as TWMIF (31). This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to TWMIF’s over the last 12 months.
GBNXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TWMIF (100). This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to TWMIF’s over the last 12 months.
GBNXF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWMIF (98). This means that GBNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWMIF’s over the last 12 months.
GBNXF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWMIF (98). This means that GBNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWMIF’s over the last 12 months.
TWMIF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBNXF (48). This means that TWMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBNXF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MAPLX | 23.93 | 0.48 | +2.05% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage L | |||
| TMFCX | 23.68 | 0.35 | +1.50% |
| Touchstone Mid Cap Value C | |||
| FSEQX | 13.45 | 0.08 | +0.60% |
| Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq I | |||
| WASYX | 22.94 | 0.06 | +0.26% |
| Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund Cl Y | |||
| PFGRX | 35.04 | N/A | N/A |
| Pioneer Fundamental Growth R | |||
GBNXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBNXF has been loosely correlated with EPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBNXF jumps, then EPD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBNXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBNXF | 100% | +2.64% | ||
| EPD - GBNXF | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| WMB - GBNXF | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| OKE - GBNXF | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| ET - GBNXF | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.77% | ||
| KMI - GBNXF | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
More | ||||
TWMIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TWMIF and ENB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWMIF and ENB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TWMIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWMIF | 100% | +2.49% | ||
| ENB - TWMIF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
| GBNXF - TWMIF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.64% | ||
| DTM - TWMIF | 16% Poorly correlated | +5.53% | ||
| TPZEF - TWMIF | 9% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
| KNTK - TWMIF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
More | ||||