GBNXF
Price
$17.98
Change
-$0.06 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
TWMIF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
268.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBNXF vs TWMIF

Header iconGBNXF vs TWMIF Comparison
Open Charts GBNXF vs TWMIFBanner chart's image
Gibson Energy
Price$17.98
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
Volume$29.34K
Capitalization2.2B
Tidewater Midstream & Infrastructure
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$57.8K
Capitalization268.81M
GBNXF vs TWMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GBNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBNXF vs. TWMIF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBNXF is a Hold and TWMIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GBNXF: $17.98 vs. TWMIF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: GBNXF and TWMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBNXF: 14% vs. TWMIF: 22%
Market capitalization -- GBNXF: $2.2B vs. TWMIF: $268.81M
GBNXF [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $2.2B. TWMIF’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $268.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBNXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTWMIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GBNXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TWMIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBNXF is a better buy in the long-term than TWMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBNXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWMIF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBNXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TWMIF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TWMIF is a better buy in the short-term than GBNXF.

Price Growth

GBNXF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.77% price change this week, while TWMIF (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.92% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBNXF($2.2B) has a higher market cap than TWMIF($269M). TWMIF has higher P/E ratio than GBNXF: TWMIF (42.92) vs GBNXF (10.88). TWMIF YTD gains are higher at: 62.476 vs. GBNXF (5.446). GBNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 541M vs. TWMIF (-254.5M). TWMIF has more cash in the bank: 337M vs. GBNXF (40.6M). TWMIF has less debt than GBNXF: TWMIF (769M) vs GBNXF (1.65B). GBNXF has higher revenues than TWMIF: GBNXF (10.7B) vs TWMIF (2.21B).
GBNXFTWMIFGBNXF / TWMIF
Capitalization2.2B269M816%
EBITDA541M-254.5M-213%
Gain YTD5.44662.4769%
P/E Ratio10.8842.9225%
Revenue10.7B2.21B485%
Total Cash40.6M337M12%
Total Debt1.65B769M214%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBNXF vs TWMIF: Fundamental Ratings
GBNXF
TWMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1129
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
5093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
362
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBNXF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as TWMIF (77). This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to TWMIF’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as TWMIF (100). This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to TWMIF’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWMIF (93). This means that GBNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWMIF’s over the last 12 months.

GBNXF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as TWMIF (63). This means that GBNXF’s stock grew similarly to TWMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TWMIF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBNXF (36). This means that TWMIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBNXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBNXFTWMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFGTX20.20N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
UIISX18.49N/A
N/A
Victory Income Stock Institutional
TSTFX20.87N/A
N/A
Transamerica Stock Index R4
FSSGX12.09N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Em Markets Eq
VETAX46.86N/A
N/A
Victory Sycamore Established Value A

GBNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBNXF has been loosely correlated with EPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBNXF jumps, then EPD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBNXF
1D Price
Change %
GBNXF100%
-0.35%
EPD - GBNXF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
WMB - GBNXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
OKE - GBNXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
ET - GBNXF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMI - GBNXF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More

TWMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TWMIF and ENB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TWMIF and ENB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWMIF
1D Price
Change %
TWMIF100%
+1.20%
ENB - TWMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
GBNXF - TWMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
DTM - TWMIF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
TPZEF - TWMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
KNTK - TWMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
More