It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QLYS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GBTG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
QLYS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.82% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.30%.
QLYS is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
GBTG | QLYS | GBTG / QLYS | |
Capitalization | 2.84B | 6.17B | 46% |
EBITDA | 190M | 190M | 100% |
Gain YTD | -20.797 | -8.237 | 252% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 41.51 | - |
Revenue | 2.29B | 554M | 413% |
Total Cash | 476M | 426M | 112% |
Total Debt | 1.43B | 28.7M | 4,997% |
QLYS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GBTG | QLYS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago62% | 15 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago53% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FNGG | 137.18 | 4.02 | +3.02% |
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | |||
NVDL | 38.26 | 0.86 | +2.30% |
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | |||
XSVM | 50.40 | 0.20 | +0.40% |
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momt ETF | |||
MAYZ | 29.04 | N/A | N/A |
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF | |||
CHAU | 14.17 | -0.12 | -0.84% |
Direxion Dly CSI 300 CHN A Shr Bl 2X ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBTG has been loosely correlated with YOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBTG jumps, then YOU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GBTG | 100% | +1.24% | ||
YOU - GBTG | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
QLYS - GBTG | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
ALRM - GBTG | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
ADSK - GBTG | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
DJCO - GBTG | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QLYS | 100% | +2.18% | ||
TENB - QLYS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
FOXO - QLYS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
EVCM - QLYS | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
DJCO - QLYS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
CLSK - QLYS | 49% Loosely correlated | +12.50% | ||
More |