Ad is loading...
GBUY vs PCGG
GBUY vs PCGG Comparison
Open Charts GBUY vs PCGG
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$30.46
Change-$1.31 (-4.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets16.72M
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Price$10.28
Change-$0.49 (-4.55%)
Volume$1K
Net Assets161.28M
GBUY vs PCGG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBUY vs. PCGG commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBUY is a Hold and PCGG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCGG has more net assets: 161M vs. GBUY (16.7M). PCGG has a higher annual dividend yield than GBUY: PCGG (-8.620) vs GBUY (-9.679). GBUY was incepted earlier than PCGG: GBUY (3 years) vs PCGG (2 years). GBUY (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than PCGG (0.85). GBUY has a higher turnover PCGG (3.65) vs PCGG (3.65).
| GBUY | PCGG | GBUY / PCGG | |
| Gain YTD | -9.679 | -8.620 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 16.7M | 161M | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.85 | 88% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 3.65 | 849% |
| Yield | 1.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GBUY | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been loosely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | -4.85% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -7.71% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -8.90% | ||
| META - GBUY | 56% Loosely correlated | -8.96% | ||
| TER - GBUY | 54% Loosely correlated | -10.20% | ||
More | ||||
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCGG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PCGG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | -4.09% | ||
| AMZN - PCGG | 76% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| MSFT - PCGG | 67% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| ADSK - PCGG | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.02% | ||
| SAP - PCGG | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| NOW - PCGG | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.06% | ||
More | ||||