Ad is loading...
GCCUX vs PCLNX
GCCUX vs PCLNX Comparison
Open Charts GCCUX vs PCLNX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy R6
Price$8.83
Change-$0.08 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.33M
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I-3
Price$6.36
Change-$0.03 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.17B
GCCUX vs PCLNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCCUX vs. PCLNX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCCUX is a Hold and PCLNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLNX has more cash in the bank: 4.17B vs. GCCUX (337M). PCLNX pays higher dividends than GCCUX: PCLNX (8.93) vs GCCUX (3.96). GCCUX was incepted earlier than PCLNX: GCCUX (10 years) vs PCLNX (7 years). PCLNX (1.20) is less costly to investors than GCCUX (0.80). PCLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCCUX: PCLNX (1000000) vs GCCUX (5000000). GCCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. PCLNX (-3.00). PCLNX return over 5 years is better than : 175.70 vs. GCCUX (115.20).
| GCCUX | PCLNX | GCCUX / PCLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.98 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.20 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.622 | -1.807 | -311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 4.17B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.96 | 8.93 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.99 | -3.00 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.05 | -2.75 | 366% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.20 | 175.70 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |