GCLMF vs MOAEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLMF is a Hold and MOAEF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GCLMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMOAEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GCLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MOAEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MOAEF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MOAEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GCLMF (@Coal) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MOAEF (@Coal) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.29%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Coal (-1.89% weekly)Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
| GCLMF | MOAEF | GCLMF / MOAEF | |
| Capitalization | 5.33M | 17.4M | 31% |
| EBITDA | -1.13M | -770.25M | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 76.923 | 23.264 | 331% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.12 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 2.91B | - |
| Total Cash | 740K | 112M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 4.94M | 5.97B | 0% |
GCLMF | MOAEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MOAEF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as GCLMF (57). This means that MOAEF’s stock grew similarly to GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.
MOAEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GCLMF (100). This means that MOAEF’s stock grew similarly to GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.
GCLMF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MOAEF (100). This means that GCLMF’s stock grew similarly to MOAEF’s over the last 12 months.
GCLMF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MOAEF (64). This means that GCLMF’s stock grew similarly to MOAEF’s over the last 12 months.
MOAEF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCLMF (100). This means that MOAEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.
| GCLMF | MOAEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 21% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 12% | 1 day ago 22% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 11% | 1 day ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
GCLMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GCLMF and CRSXF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCLMF and CRSXF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCLMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRSXF - GCLMF | 3% Poorly correlated | +5.57% | ||
| MOAEF - GCLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CUAEF - GCLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOAEY - GCLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCOZY - GCLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MOAEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MOAEF and PTIZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MOAEF and PTIZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOAEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOAEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PTIZF - MOAEF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOGLF - MOAEF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| NHPEF - MOAEF | 1% Poorly correlated | +8.33% | ||
| GCLMF - MOAEF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOAEY - MOAEF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||