GCLMF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.05 (+500.00%)
Updated
Mar 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.33M
NHPEF
Price
$2.29
Change
-$0.19 (-7.63%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
Ad is loading...

GCLMF vs NHPEF

Header iconGCLMF vs NHPEF Comparison
Open Charts GCLMF vs NHPEFBanner chart's image
GCM Resources
Price$0.06
Change+$0.05 (+500.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization5.33M
New Hope
Price$2.29
Change-$0.19 (-7.63%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization3.02B
GCLMF vs NHPEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCLMF vs. NHPEF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLMF is a Hold and NHPEF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GCLMF: $0.06 vs. NHPEF: $2.30)
Brand notoriety: GCLMF and NHPEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Coal industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCLMF: 191% vs. NHPEF: 97%
Market capitalization -- GCLMF: $5.33M vs. NHPEF: $3.02B
GCLMF [@Coal] is valued at $5.33M. NHPEF’s [@Coal] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Coal] industry ranges from $75.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Coal] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCLMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNHPEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GCLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NHPEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NHPEF is a better buy in the long-term than GCLMF.

Price Growth

GCLMF (@Coal) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NHPEF (@Coal) price change was -5.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -3.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Coal (-3.55% weekly)

Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHPEF($3.02B) has a higher market cap than GCLMF($5.33M). GCLMF YTD gains are higher at: 500.000 vs. NHPEF (-27.143). NHPEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.04B vs. GCLMF (-1.13M). NHPEF has more cash in the bank: 70.4M vs. GCLMF (740K). GCLMF has less debt than NHPEF: GCLMF (4.94M) vs NHPEF (439M). NHPEF has higher revenues than GCLMF: NHPEF (3.1B) vs GCLMF (0).
GCLMFNHPEFGCLMF / NHPEF
Capitalization5.33M3.02B0%
EBITDA-1.13M2.04B-0%
Gain YTD500.000-27.143-1,842%
P/E RatioN/A3.81-
Revenue03.1B-
Total Cash740K70.4M1%
Total Debt4.94M439M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCLMF vs NHPEF: Fundamental Ratings
GCLMF
NHPEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3583
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
9219
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCLMF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHPEF (87). This means that GCLMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHPEF’s over the last 12 months.

NHPEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCLMF (100). This means that NHPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.

NHPEF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCLMF (92). This means that NHPEF’s stock grew significantly faster than GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.

GCLMF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NHPEF (64). This means that GCLMF’s stock grew similarly to NHPEF’s over the last 12 months.

NHPEF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCLMF (100). This means that NHPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SWPPX87.32N/A
N/A
Schwab® S&P 500 Index
MGLBX25.45N/A
N/A
Marsico Global
SPSDX17.27N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq C
JDINX47.47N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Overseas N
EPLDX20.86-0.84
-3.87%
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class R6

GCLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCLMF and MOAEF have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCLMF and MOAEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCLMF
1D Price
Change %
GCLMF100%
N/A
MOAEF - GCLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUAEF - GCLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOAEY - GCLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOZY - GCLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHPEF - GCLMF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NHPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHPEF and WHITF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHPEF and WHITF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHPEF
1D Price
Change %
NHPEF100%
N/A
WHITF - NHPEF
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.77%
BTU - NHPEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-10.08%
ARLP - NHPEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
CSUAY - NHPEF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITAYY - NHPEF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More