GCMG
Price
$11.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
47 days until earnings call
VRTS
Price
$209.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GCMG vs VRTS

Header iconGCMG vs VRTS Comparison
Open Charts GCMG vs VRTSBanner chart's image
GCM Grosvenor
Price$11.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$225.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Virtus Investment Partners
Price$209.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23.61K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
GCMG vs VRTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
GCMG vs. VRTS commentary
Sep 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCMG is a Buy and VRTS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 21, 2024
Stock price -- (GCMG: $11.25 vs. VRTS: $206.03)
Brand notoriety: GCMG and VRTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCMG: 100% vs. VRTS: 115%
Market capitalization -- GCMG: $415.35M vs. VRTS: $1.71B
GCMG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $415.35M. VRTS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GCMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRTS is a better buy in the long-term than GCMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCMG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VRTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRTS is a better buy in the short-term than GCMG.

Price Growth

GCMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.75% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

GCMG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

VRTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 25, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.76% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTS($1.72B) has a higher market cap than GCMG($415M). GCMG has higher P/E ratio than VRTS: GCMG (80.00) vs VRTS (13.66). GCMG YTD gains are higher at: 29.955 vs. VRTS (-12.671). VRTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 434M vs. GCMG (4.93M). VRTS has more cash in the bank: 340M vs. GCMG (44.4M). GCMG has less debt than VRTS: GCMG (426M) vs VRTS (2.18B). VRTS has higher revenues than GCMG: VRTS (841M) vs GCMG (457M).
GCMGVRTSGCMG / VRTS
Capitalization415M1.72B24%
EBITDA4.93M434M1%
Gain YTD29.955-12.671-236%
P/E Ratio80.0013.66586%
Revenue457M841M54%
Total Cash44.4M340M13%
Total Debt426M2.18B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VRTS: Fundamental Ratings
VRTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCMGVRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYMCX8.46-0.01
-0.12%
Royce Micro-Cap Consult
MIOLX25.04-0.03
-0.12%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp L
TROSX13.56-0.05
-0.37%
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock
RYCHX146.32-0.78
-0.53%
Rydex Technology C
MMUHX24.20-0.23
-0.94%
MFS Utilities R3

GCMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCMG has been loosely correlated with VRTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCMG jumps, then VRTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCMG
1D Price
Change %
GCMG100%
-1.75%
VRTS - GCMG
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
APAM - GCMG
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
AMG - GCMG
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
CNS - GCMG
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
TPG - GCMG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More

VRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been loosely correlated with CNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then CNS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRTS
1D Price
Change %
VRTS100%
-0.17%
CNS - VRTS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
APAM - VRTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
BEN - VRTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
JHG - VRTS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
TROW - VRTS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More