GCMG
Price
$12.65
Change
-$0.25 (-1.94%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
415.35M
63 days until earnings call
VRTS
Price
$172.03
Change
-$9.61 (-5.29%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.71B
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GCMG vs VRTS

Header iconGCMG vs VRTS Comparison
Open Charts GCMG vs VRTSBanner chart's image
GCM Grosvenor
Price$12.65
Change-$0.25 (-1.94%)
Volume$6.05K
Capitalization415.35M
Virtus Investment Partners
Price$172.03
Change-$9.61 (-5.29%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.71B
GCMG vs VRTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCMG vs. VRTS commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCMG is a Hold and VRTS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GCMG: $12.90 vs. VRTS: $181.64)
Brand notoriety: GCMG and VRTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCMG: 94% vs. VRTS: 140%
Market capitalization -- GCMG: $415.35M vs. VRTS: $1.71B
GCMG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $415.35M. VRTS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCMG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GCMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the long-term than VRTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VRTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRTS is a better buy in the short-term than GCMG.

Price Growth

GCMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.92% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

GCMG is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

VRTS is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.45% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTS($1.72B) has a higher market cap than GCMG($415M). GCMG has higher P/E ratio than VRTS: GCMG (80.00) vs VRTS (13.66). GCMG YTD gains are higher at: 5.960 vs. VRTS (-16.767). VRTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 434M vs. GCMG (4.93M). VRTS has more cash in the bank: 340M vs. GCMG (44.4M). GCMG has less debt than VRTS: GCMG (426M) vs VRTS (2.18B). VRTS has higher revenues than GCMG: VRTS (841M) vs GCMG (457M).
GCMGVRTSGCMG / VRTS
Capitalization415M1.72B24%
EBITDA4.93M434M1%
Gain YTD5.960-16.767-36%
P/E Ratio80.0013.66586%
Revenue457M841M54%
Total Cash44.4M340M13%
Total Debt426M2.18B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCMG vs VRTS: Fundamental Ratings
GCMG
VRTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6062
SMR RATING
1..100
756
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4379
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRTS's Valuation (17) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCMG (93) in the null industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew significantly faster than GCMG’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as VRTS (62) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GCMG’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRTS (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GCMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRTS (79) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GCMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRTS (79) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GCMG’s stock grew significantly faster than VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCMGVRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEIYX8.850.09
+1.03%
American Century Equity Income Y
GMNPX39.560.28
+0.71%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras P
EMCAX63.100.42
+0.67%
Empiric Class A
SBSPX44.630.25
+0.56%
Franklin S&P 500 Index A
GGGAX56.83-0.02
-0.04%
Gabelli Global Growth A

GCMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCMG has been loosely correlated with WT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCMG jumps, then WT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCMG
1D Price
Change %
GCMG100%
-0.23%
WT - GCMG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
HLNE - GCMG
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
ARES - GCMG
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
BN - GCMG
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
AMG - GCMG
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
More

VRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRTS
1D Price
Change %
VRTS100%
+0.23%
APAM - VRTS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
JHG - VRTS
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
IVZ - VRTS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
CNS - VRTS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
TROW - VRTS
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
More