GCT vs YMM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCT is a Hold and YMM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GCT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYMM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GCT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- YMM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GCT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YMM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GCT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- YMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GCT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -13.51% price change this week, while YMM (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
GCT is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.
YMM is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.89% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| GCT | YMM | GCT / YMM | |
| Capitalization | 1.26B | 7.78B | 16% |
| EBITDA | 119M | 1.95B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | -25.648 | 15.804 | -162% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.40 | 30.00 | 45% |
| Revenue | 704M | 7.95B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 183M | 19.8B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 403M | 57.4M | 702% |
| GCT | YMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BKLN | 20.52 | -0.21 | -1.01% |
| Invesco Senior Loan ETF | |||
| FFC | 15.46 | -0.55 | -3.44% |
| Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund | |||
| SEPZ | 35.95 | -1.28 | -3.44% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome Sep ETF | |||
| IZRL | 21.32 | -0.91 | -4.09% |
| ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF | |||
| FINX | 26.65 | -1.79 | -6.29% |
| Global X FinTech ETF | |||
GCT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCT has been loosely correlated with LSPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCT jumps, then LSPD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCT | 100% | -6.52% | ||
| LSPD - GCT | 39% Loosely correlated | -9.39% | ||
| API - GCT | 33% Loosely correlated | -6.20% | ||
| LYFT - GCT | 33% Poorly correlated | -11.35% | ||
| BILI - GCT | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| QTWO - GCT | 31% Poorly correlated | -8.13% | ||
More | ||||
YMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YMM has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YMM jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMM | 100% | -3.69% | ||
| BILI - YMM | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| DIDIY - YMM | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| NTES - YMM | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| KC - YMM | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| RIOT - YMM | 39% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
More | ||||