Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GDIV vs RECS
GDIV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts GDIV vs RECS
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
Price$15.49
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
Volume$10.12K
Net Assets217M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$37.41
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
Volume$367
Net Assets3.08B
GDIV vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDIV vs. RECS commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDIV is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.08B vs. GDIV (217M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than GDIV: RECS (8.146) vs GDIV (2.266). GDIV was incepted earlier than RECS: GDIV (12 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GDIV (0.50). GDIV has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| GDIV | RECS | GDIV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.266 | 8.146 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 217M | 3.08B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.15 | 333% |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 49.00 | 118% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 0.65 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GDIV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDIV has been closely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDIV jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDIV | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| OWL - GDIV | 79% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| MAR - GDIV | 75% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| BYD - GDIV | 71% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| MTB - GDIV | 68% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| META - GDIV | 68% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||