Ad is loading...
GDLFX vs NLSCX
GDLFX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GDLFX vs NLSCX
Gotham Defensive Long 500 Institutional
Price$18.40
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.99M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
GDLFX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDLFX vs. NLSCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDLFX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. GDLFX (18M). GDLFX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GDLFX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GDLFX (9 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than GDLFX (2.20). GDLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 182.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GDLFX: NLSCX (1000) vs GDLFX (25000). GDLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. NLSCX (6.07). GDLFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.50 vs. NLSCX (25.16).
| GDLFX | NLSCX | GDLFX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.43 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 2.43 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.361 | 1.752 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18M | 7.33B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 6.07 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.21 | 13.07 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.50 | 25.16 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...