GDOT
Price
$8.19
Change
+$0.12 (+1.49%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
481.28M
11 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$48.79
Change
+$0.10 (+0.21%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GDOT vs OMF

Header iconGDOT vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts GDOT vs OMFBanner chart's image
Green Dot
Price$8.19
Change+$0.12 (+1.49%)
Volume$321.83K
Capitalization481.28M
OneMain Holdings
Price$48.79
Change+$0.10 (+0.21%)
Volume$812.37K
Capitalization6.02B
GDOT vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GDOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDOT vs. OMF commentary
Apr 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDOT is a Buy and OMF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GDOT: $8.19 vs. OMF: $48.79)
Brand notoriety: GDOT and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDOT: 27% vs. OMF: 62%
Market capitalization -- GDOT: $481.28M vs. OMF: $6.02B
GDOT [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $481.28M. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDOT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • GDOT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than GDOT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDOT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDOT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GDOT is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

GDOT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +10.38% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +9.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

GDOT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.36% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than GDOT($481M). GDOT has higher P/E ratio than OMF: GDOT (70.08) vs OMF (9.44). OMF YTD gains are higher at: -4.659 vs. GDOT (-23.026). GDOT has less debt than OMF: GDOT (67.1M) vs OMF (19.8B). OMF has higher revenues than GDOT: OMF (4.28B) vs GDOT (1.5B).
GDOTOMFGDOT / OMF
Capitalization481M6.02B8%
EBITDA103MN/A-
Gain YTD-23.026-4.659494%
P/E Ratio70.089.44742%
Revenue1.5B4.28B35%
Total Cash716MN/A-
Total Debt67.1M19.8B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDOT vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
GDOT
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4136
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
906
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
223
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDOT (88). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDOT (100). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDOT (90). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as GDOT (74). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

GDOT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (23). This means that GDOT’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDOTOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GDOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IIM11.720.06
+0.51%
INVESCO VALUE Municipal Income TRUST
BNDD12.850.05
+0.38%
Quadratic Deflation ETF
UCON24.650.06
+0.24%
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Pls Bd ETF
FT7.29-0.01
-0.13%
Franklin Universal Trust
ECNS27.16-0.35
-1.27%
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF

GDOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDOT has been loosely correlated with BFH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDOT jumps, then BFH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDOT
1D Price
Change %
GDOT100%
+1.49%
BFH - GDOT
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
NAVI - GDOT
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
SYF - GDOT
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
ECPG - GDOT
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
OMF - GDOT
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+0.21%
ENVA - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
COF - OMF
80%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
AXP - OMF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
DFS - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
SLM - OMF
75%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
More